The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gambling.

No, they weren't personally in participation, but the world-famous celebs were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites providing both free casino-style video games and lucrative rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to discuss claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as standard gambling establishments, only without the oversight, consumer protections and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal sports betting levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the business faces allegations of illegal sports betting in a New York suit that claims VGW utilizes celebrity endorsers to 'create a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm unsure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebs from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any differences between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many - but not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he frequently promotes on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements typically center around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the capacity for actual gaming losses.

Others tempt customers with pledges of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad revealing off Drake's vehicles, airplanes and estates before rotating to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' check out the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever provided up.'

The discrepancy in between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.

A representative for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, many of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting complimentary.

'Most social sweeps clients never buy,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online sports betting websites.'

Social casinos provide clients a chance to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the alternative to purchase valueless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, but can be used to open different functions within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling customers to obtain other currency known as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's cars, planes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7 states, which has actually assisted to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which don't need typically need recognition. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit customers to send mail-in demands for totally free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for registering, consequently providing a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of casino games for a possibility to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a way of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a kind of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never need to pay for a chance to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an essential difference in between social sweeps and traditional online gaming sites like casinos.'

Think of the way that McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that provide them the possibility to win lucrative rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself does not meet the definition of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all kinds of daily services in the United States, everything from hamburgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are frequently used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many sports betting market insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thereby recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're typically not tied to casino-style video games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the qualities typically connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes casinos provide" casino-like" payments, usually 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the normal payment percentage for a short-lived promotional sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the income earned by the business [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, offering customers the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. Many of those brick-and-mortar establishments have considering that been shuttered over claims of unlawful gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to deal with comparable scrutiny.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have consistently been cited by courts and state chief law officer as essential factors in figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion was in truth a guise for illegal gambling.'

Among the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact brand-new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being deprived of protections and states are giving up considerable tax and income opportunities as this sports betting replaces that conducted through regulated channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current suit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New york city state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'illegal sports betting business. '

Apple and Google have also been called as defendants in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for remark.

'We generally do not comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and stay positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play games throughout many of North America, as we have for more than a years, creating not only excellent games, user experiences and home entertainment, however likewise ensuring this is done safely, properly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to intensely defend any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns between standard online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking illegal sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the exact same time the leagues desire to forecast a strong stance versus prohibited gambling - particularly when attempting to tamp down the occasional gambling scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time restriction from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably prohibited sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' agents responded to DailyMail.com's demands for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also disregarded to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to describe to consumers the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our company practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our values are" our gamers precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious illegal gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state attorneys general rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating illegal gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton